Comments on: G7 Radio – Episode 2

By: Wilson

Wilson — Sat, 25 Mar 2006 05:53:40 +0000

It’s just too bad that there is so much resistance in the alternative media and radio shows (such as this) to recognize this as an important issue. We should help our American friends in exposing the U.S. governments conspiracy theory for what it is.

By: Jennifer

Jennifer — Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:26:10 +0000

I’d like to add that when I saw Zinn speak in Gainesville, during the question/answer session, a question was brought up and when Zinn went into saying something along the lines of “the world trade centers were destroyed…” (can’t remember the exact question) someone yelled “INSIDE JOB” and then he went like “well…. we won’t get into that.” Yeah, that was paraphrased, but my hypothesis is that since Zinn is a rather large figure representing radical ideas, he wouldn’t want to get on the wrong side of the government by publically supporting the conspiracy theory, although, from what he implied, I’m pretty sure he at least sees them as remotely legitimate.

By: ?

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:15:07 +0000

http://www.infowars....ficial_911_story.htm

By: eyegor

eyegor — Sun, 19 Mar 2006 10:22:09 +0000

hey guys, don’t forget to broadcast some Slayer/Sodom/(oldest)Metallica/(oldest)Exodus/Megadeth/Vio-Lence/Destruction/GFK/Malefaction/Sepultura/Ratos De Porao/Assuck/Nasum/Swallowing Shit/MDC… (complete filling with other rockin bands) stuff.
Anyways, I keep waiting for chris to say something about propagandhi doing european tour (crossed fingers). duh

By: sean

sean — Sat, 18 Mar 2006 06:10:34 +0000

The show rocks. I keep waiting for chris to say something about propagandhi doing an east coast tour though (crosses fingers)

By: Wilson

Wilson — Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:37:08 +0000

The article was interesting but reinforces the difficulties of talking the events of 9/11 rationally. There is a difference between someone with a website who makes up “theories” and the competent researchers.
In the case of 9/11 pretty much all evidence that would “prove” what happened was destroyed or is classified by the governemnt.
The Bush admin initially denied requests for an independent investigation into 9/11. Then after caving in they underfunded it and appointed their own buddies to do the “independent” investigation. The final report is filled with many obvious innacuracies and lies (not like anyone will read it). The commission also independently altered evidence without giving any reason to do so. I could go on but instead I’ll just make my point.

I’m not one for making up unprovable theories, that is what the U.S. governemnt did.
There needs to be a REAL investigation into 9/11 so we can clear up this confusion and hold the perpetrators of this accountable. That is my point. It IS important in my opinion as it is still being exploited.

By: drew

drew — Wed, 15 Mar 2006 21:52:25 +0000

this video looks retarded.

By: ?

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:11:20 +0000

is the illuminati fact or faction see above
pretty interesting

By: ?

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:10:15 +0000

http://video.google....=2956184071444476530

By: v

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:20:24 +0000

i’m not missing your point, i think we’re just debating different things. i’m discussing a singular event, while you are looking at the broader picture. while i TOTALLY AGREE with you and that article in regards to the broader picture concerning systems, institutions, and conspiracies, i disagree concerning this particular event because of certain undeniable facts that SUGGEST gov’t involvement in some capacity. furthermore, while i believe that most of what those articles discuss is valid, that does not mean that conspiracies are not possible, and/or have not happened in the past.
this confusion is recognizably caused by the medium through which we are communicating. my extremely short career as a blogger may be finished, i dislike it.