G7 Welcoming Committee Records. Uncooperative since 1997.

You appear to be using a shitty web browser. Brent suggests getting a better one.

Truth about 9/11 revealed: Pentagon hit by some blurry white thing!

Posted by on 05/17/06 (Shite)

The Pentagon for the first time yesterday released video from two different surveillance cameras taken the morning of September 11th, 2001. The release come as the result of a Freedom of Information Act request filed by Judicial Watch (or Scott Hodes, depending on who you ask).

Basically these videos are the same crap that has been circulated over the past 4 years in various analyses of the attack on the Pentagon. But nonetheless – I’m glad we can finally close the case on conspiracy theories with this conclusive and fully-revealing video!

Anyway, see for yourself.

Pentagon Video 1

Above is the idyllic, peaceful tranquility of the Pentagon …

Pentagon Video 2

… now, on the far right, something enters the picture. Apparently a Q-Tip? The next frame of the video has shit blowing up.

Pentagon Video 3

Once again, solitude on gumdrop lane the Pentagon lawn …

Pentagon Video 4

… and once again, one frame before all hell breaks loose, we have the mystery tampon.

The real question here is: why is the Pentagon’s surveillance equipment the equivalent of a camera-phone tied to a stick hundreds of feet away from the very building it’s surveilling? I’ve seen convenience store surveillance footage that’s fucking IMAX 3D compared to this bullshit.

The answer of course is that it’s not. This is just the feed they dole out to the proles.

The “full videos” can be viewed, YouTube-style, on Judicial Watch’s website.

54 fragments of dialogue thus far ...

(Subscribe to discussion about this post via RSS)

  • Comment by D-Rock on May 17th, 2006 at 10:39 am:

    Even Democracy Now! is reporting this totally at face value:

    Back in the United States, the Justice Department has released new video footage of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon. The video shows American Airlines flight 77 approaching the Pentagon at nearly ground level. Moments later, the Pentagon is seen in flames. Judicial Watch, the public interest group that obtained the video’s release, said it hoped the footage helps put to rest theories the Pentagon was hit by something other than a hijacked plane.

  • Comment by Sean on May 17th, 2006 at 4:45 pm:

    As a former CNN employee, I can testify to the practice of cut-and-paste journalism. They all read the same AP stories and simply rearrange the words before passing them on to us. Democracy Now! is no different. It all comes from the same source, so if you control the source, you control all flow of information.

  • Comment by Nick on May 17th, 2006 at 5:43 pm:

    I’m not really sure how a video that still doesn’t show any distinguishable plane is supposed to put to rest any theories that the Pentagon was hit by something other than a hijacked plane.

  • Comment by Patrick on May 17th, 2006 at 6:27 pm:

    As far as I’m concerned, this finally settles the controversy and legitimizes the explanation of where my Potemkin City Limits LP is.

  • Comment by stepford tom on May 17th, 2006 at 6:48 pm:

    can you guys see on the roof? look closer! colin powell on george w. bush himself are guiding the plane in! the administration must be involved!

  • Comment by stepford tom on May 17th, 2006 at 6:55 pm:

    and i should point out that this inconclusive evidence is selectively edited 5 years later. would this have changed if the democrats were in power? let’s ask fat mike!

  • Comment by Kyle on May 17th, 2006 at 9:46 pm:

    This doesn’t look any different than the ‘footage’ — if you can call a couple of frames footage — that has been available for years.

    I don’t know planes very well, but it looks more like a Cessna than whatever it’s supposed to be. It’s kind of hard to see though, huh?

    I’m taking a class on terrorism now. Shouldn’t the attack on the Pentagon be considered an act of war since it’s a military target? Until it’s proven what hit the Pentagon (a plane full of civilians, for example), should that really be considered terrorism?

    Multiple definitions of terrorism make it complicated: Check out the US State Department’s definition! (I can’t find it, but it involves groups that attack the US military when the US hasn’t declared war on those groups.)

  • Comment by Danarcho on May 17th, 2006 at 10:07 pm:

    This footage makes me wonder if any giant explosive tampons are flying in Afghanis too! Cuz you know…it was the Afghan’s attack and all…that’s why there was an invasion…right? …heh…yeah…

  • Comment by drew on May 18th, 2006 at 12:19 am:

    what do you guys all think of the conspiracy theories surrounding 9-11?

  • Comment by court the destroyer on May 18th, 2006 at 12:36 pm:

    Nick on May 17th, 2006 at 5:43 pm:
    I’m not really sure how a video that still doesn’t show any distinguishable plane is supposed to put to rest any theories that the Pentagon was hit by something other than a hijacked plane.

    Goddamn UFO’s.

  • Comment by Smitty on May 18th, 2006 at 3:32 pm:

    http://video.google....5106958&pl=true

    http://www.reopen911.org

    have a watch of that

  • Comment by Craig on May 19th, 2006 at 5:40 pm:

    Besides a few crackpots whose grasp on physics is nonexistent at best, no credible source has suggested that plane didn’t hit the Pentagon. What, did the government really hijack a few airliners and crash them into some buildings, then fake this third one by stealing a plane and “dissappearing” all the passengers that were on it? Or, better yet, the passengers and the plane didn’t really exist at all. I bet the guys that faked the moon landing were in on it, too.

    Yeah, it’s grainy video. It doesn’t show a plane. Who cares? The Bush administration used these attacks to dishonestly justify a war it had already planned, yes, but that’s hardly proof that they staged it. There is simply no evidence for such a claim.

    Bush has killed hundreds of thousands in Iraq. That is monstrous enough. We don’t need to fabricate corny conspiracy theories.

    -Craig

  • Comment by Stefan on May 19th, 2006 at 6:42 pm:

    First off these crappy pictures in no way disprove the conspiracy theory.

    Second there is so much evidence that actually proves 9/11 was an inside job that the media and government wants to focus on the pentagon to debunk all the other evidence that proves 9/11 was a government operation.

    Some of evidence includes….

    1) Insider trading of American airlines by CIA front companies

    2) Mayor Willie Brown of San Francisco was told not to fly to New York the day before 9/11.

    3)WTC Building 7 was not hit by a plane but it was “pulled” admitted by building owner Larry Silverstein … pulled is another word for controlled demolition which takes weeks to set up. How did Al Qaeda do this?

    4) CIA was running drills the morning of 9.11 simulating planes being flown into the WTC and pentagon. The drills confused NORAD workers and resulted in the atrocities.

    5)The American military is no doubt the richest most powerful military in the world.
    The North eastern seaboard is the most protected airspace in the world. How did 4 planes get high jacked in 2 hours.

    6) 9 of the 17 Hi-Jackers have been found alive and well.

    7) No steel frame structure has ever been destroyed by fire.

    8) Blasts can be seen exploding out of the sides of 1 and 2 while it is collapsing.

    9) Banks stored large amounts of gold in the trade center basements and they were removed and also claimed on insurance.

    10) 3 weeks after the collapse molten hot steel was found at the rubble of WTC 1 and 2.
    Jet fuel does not burn hot enough or long enough to cause this.

    11) Operation Northwood’s – Declassified government document – find it….. calls for the sinking of US Ship… Blowing up a plane of Americans to blame it on Cuba… as a pretext to invade…

    12) PNAC … Project For A New American Century ( NEO -CON THINK TANK) called for a NEW PEARL HARBOUR … to help gain control of America and the world.

    13) The terrorist did not have the flight skills to pull off the maneuvers to hit their targets. The were trained at American Flight Schools and could barely fly Cessna.

    Don’t believe anything I have said check it out for yourself….

  • Comment by Stefan on May 19th, 2006 at 6:45 pm:

    http://video.google....038;q=loose+change+2

  • Comment by Stefan on May 19th, 2006 at 6:58 pm:

    http://video.google....q=immortal+technique

  • Comment by Craig on May 19th, 2006 at 7:09 pm:

    Stefan, you’ve convinced me… But I’ve got some crazy shit here that’s gonna blow your mind:

    Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
    John F. Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.

    Abraham Lincoln was elected President in 1860.
    John F. Kennedy was elected President in 1960.

    The names Lincoln and Kennedy each contain seven letters.

    Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.

    Both wives lost their children while living in the White House.

    Both Presidents were shot on a Friday.

    Both were shot in the head.

    Lincoln’s secretary was named Kennedy.
    Kennedy’s secretary was named Lincoln.

    Both were assassinated by Southerners.

    Both were succeeded by Southerners.

    Both successors were named Johnson.

    Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808.
    Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908.

    John Wilkes Booth,was born in 1839.
    Lee Harvey Oswald,was born in 1939.

    Both assassins were known by their three names.

    Both names are comprised of fifteen letters

    Booth ran from the theater and was caught in a warehouse.
    Oswald ran from a warehouse and was caught in a theater.

    Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.

    CRAZY!

    -Craig

  • Comment by Stefan on May 19th, 2006 at 7:25 pm:

    http://video.google....q=immortal+technique

    check these immortal technique videos… thought provoking as well as dope!!

  • Comment by drew on May 19th, 2006 at 8:57 pm:

    i would just like to say that i completely agree with craig’s comment. what do you guys at G7 think?

  • Comment by April on May 19th, 2006 at 10:38 pm:

    Jeez..that Is really crappy video for the Pentagon…you would think they would have more (and better) surveillance cameras.
    I am not really sure about theories that the plane did not hit, but I do believe there’s a lot of shady shit involved with the events of 9/11.

  • Comment by stepford tom on May 20th, 2006 at 11:32 am:

    the video’s crap and any real evidence will be or has been destroyed/buried. maybe we’ll get lucky and they’ll release some “classified” information in a decade or two.

    the question is, would it stop the wars on terrorism if the US government/military were found to be involved? or the nuculer threat of iran or occupation of palestine, guantanamo? would it stop fox from putting out shows like 24?

    there is another conspiracy theory concerning the other flight that never made its’ target. thats the one with the movie about it i think. but some people think that said plane was shot down, and not defiantly self-sacrificed by the real american heroes. who knows?

    please don’t put charles on the money!

  • Comment by drew on May 20th, 2006 at 11:42 am:

    i meant, i agree with craig’s first comment:

    “Besides a few crackpots whose grasp on physics is nonexistent at best, no credible source has suggested that plane didn’t hit the Pentagon. What, did the government really hijack a few airliners and crash them into some buildings, then fake this third one by stealing a plane and “dissappearing” all the passengers that were on it? Or, better yet, the passengers and the plane didn’t really exist at all. I bet the guys that faked the moon landing were in on it, too.

    Yeah, it’s grainy video. It doesn’t show a plane. Who cares? The Bush administration used these attacks to dishonestly justify a war it had already planned, yes, but that’s hardly proof that they staged it. There is simply no evidence for such a claim.

    Bush has killed hundreds of thousands in Iraq. That is monstrous enough. We don’t need to fabricate corny conspiracy theories.”

  • Comment by Stefan on May 20th, 2006 at 4:29 pm:

    I think if the majority of the American Public found out 9/11 was as inside job they would revolt against the powers to be and cause serious change in politics.

    9/11 is america’s reichstag fire ( hitler buring down german parilment & blaming it on his enemies) and if this could be public knowledge support for the combat of terrorism would plumbit. So would the death of hundereds of thousands of inncocent lives in Iraq and forgiveness between Muslim and the rest of the world could begin.

    drew … there is proof they staged it… and if you are smart you would research it yourself before calling facts a conspiracy theory….

  • Comment by Stefan on May 20th, 2006 at 4:31 pm:

    watch loose change 2…. research the facts then come get back to me………..

    loose change 2nd edition is the most popular video on google video… there are a lot of people who are waking up to this issue…

  • Comment by soyuz on May 20th, 2006 at 9:38 pm:

    thanks for the post of 911: Loose Change. i’d never heard about these theories before. it certainly made me rethink a lot of stuff i thought i knew about 911. great documentary. more people need to know about this. thanks Stefan.

  • Comment by D-Rock on May 21st, 2006 at 2:39 pm:

    I’ve watched both Loose Change and Painful Deceptions, and can say they both raised many issues that I found hard to explain and disturbing. But all these films provide is theories (obviously, since there’s so little hard evidence available), so they should be taken as such. They’re not hard facts, and many times in both they conflate what is actually a series of assumptions strung together, with hard evidence.

    I have no reason to belive the official line is true – decades of U.S. history bears this out. Why can’t the public see the tapes confiscated from the gas station and hotel of the Pentagon attack? Why this, why that, etc? These are all valid questions (especially that last one), and the silence on them only goes to the idea that the official line is – in part or wholly – a lie.

    I’m no scientist!

  • Comment by Belinda on May 21st, 2006 at 5:11 pm:

    I heard about Tecumseh’s curse earlier last year and thought it was interesting. Supposedly every 20 years the President will die. They have, up until Regan somehow lived through his shooting. Did he somehow break the curse, saving Bush’s bum bum?

    http://americanhisto...dents/a/tecumseh.htm

  • Comment by stepford tom on May 21st, 2006 at 11:42 pm:

    shit, i’m late!

  • Comment by drew on May 21st, 2006 at 11:42 pm:

    derek nailed it!

  • Comment by drew on May 22nd, 2006 at 12:04 am:

    i posted this on an old g7 blog a few months back, but this article is even more relevant in this blog post. take a read, its one of the best articles ive come accross on the 9-11 conspriacy theory issue.

    http://www.zmag.org/...icle.cfm?ItemID=1963

  • Comment by mikea on May 22nd, 2006 at 5:20 am:

    Just watched Loose Change…Raises a lot of pretty disturbing questions, yep, but…i don’t know!

  • Comment by Stefan on May 22nd, 2006 at 11:24 am:

    Drew —-

    that article is a whitewash….
    Im sorry but Zmag….has no balls and obviously does not want to confront domestic terrorism in the USA….

    If Zmag/net was actually for truth.. they wouldnt toe the line of the government calling these “crackpot theories”. Cmon give me a break… thats what CNN calls these theories and every other major media source.

    again you dont not have to be a scientist to realize 9.11 was self inflicted. You just need common sense.

  • Comment by mikea on May 23rd, 2006 at 9:20 am:

    “that article is a whitewash”
    “thats what CNN calls these theories and every other major media source.”

    Stefan, i believe you’re missing something cruial: contrary to the U.S. government and its Department of Propaganda (aka CNN, Foxnews…), the guy who wrote the article would have absolutely no interest in hidding the “truth”, even if the truth was that 9-11 was “self inflicted”.

    I personnaly am not 100% convinced by this guy’s argumentation, and i understand that people like you whom are 100% convinced that they know the truth about 9-11, feel irritated by this guy’s despising tone and obvious total close-mindedness about the view you hold, but, i believe you just couldn’t compare Znet to CNN and the likes if you were more familiar with it… It’s just one guy’s opinion that they publish and i doubt this fully represents what everyone there thinks.

    Moreover, though this guy totally overlooks the many issues and questions raised by all the bizarre stuff and lack of clearness around 9-11 (as pointed out by the movies), and i wouldn’t be surprised if he had never even paid honnest attention to those issues, and this maybe a pity ,yep, his third point is solid, buddy. At least to me.

  • Comment by jennifer on May 23rd, 2006 at 3:26 pm:

    i believe that the dealings of 9/11 were sketchy as fuck, and if there actually a real conspiracy behind it, it would unveil soon enough… the bush administration is not comptent enough to cloak such a collosal thing. i, however, am not set on my opinion on the extent of the role our government played, but i’m sure we at least had some prior knowledge.

  • Comment by Nick on May 23rd, 2006 at 6:26 pm:

    I don’t think anyone out there is 100% convinced that they know exactly what happened. But, there are certain aspects of 9/11 where the government’s explanation of what happened is completely impossible. (ie. the explanation that “fire” is what brought the two towers down, etc.) I’m not convinced that any of the theories of what could have happened (ie. what could have hit the pentagon) are true either. Most are just guesses, but still the guesses do make more sense than the governments explanation, once all the evidence is considered. That’s how it seems to me, anyways.

  • Comment by soyuz on May 27th, 2006 at 8:23 pm:

    though ‘Loose Change’ challenged a lot of what i thought i knew about 9/11, i had to find another viewpoint on these theories since these are theories about what happened on 9/11. so here’s the other side of the story.

  • Comment by soyuz on May 27th, 2006 at 8:24 pm:

    here’s the link i tried to put with my previous post. i don’t know how to link it.

    http://www.popularme...defense/1227842.html

  • Comment by Stefan on May 28th, 2006 at 3:53 pm:

    Popular Mechanics (March 2005)
    focused on bogus 9/11 claims to discredit real evidence of complicity.

    Soyuz check this out.. the other side to the other side

    http://www.oilempire...pular-mechanics.html

    and check out this website anyone who questions the 9/11 attack

    http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/

  • Comment by Stéphane on May 28th, 2006 at 4:44 pm:

    hmmmm… i suggest that those interested check out the movie “confronting evidences”. its free on the reopen911 site. i went to see it being ready to accept that the bushies shot a missile at the pentagon. i came out depressed cause i thought the bush adm. coudn’t really NOT have planned the whole fucking thing. which really sucks. among other things. anyhoo, the video, though long, is worth seeing especially since its free (i think).

  • Comment by Stefan on May 29th, 2006 at 5:29 pm:

    http://physics911.net/

  • Comment by Stefan on May 29th, 2006 at 5:32 pm:

    PHYSICS 911 is created and maintained by a group of scientists, engineers and other professionals known collectively as the Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-eleven.

  • Comment by drew on May 29th, 2006 at 6:53 pm:

    physics 911 sounds interesting. perhaps i’ll have to check it out. thanks for the info.

  • Comment by drew on May 29th, 2006 at 7:33 pm:

    so i checked out physics 911 a bit and i think it still falls under the category of conspriacy theory. i mean, most conspriacy theories claim to have scientific evidence. in michael ruppert’s film, the truth and lies of 9-11, he states that everything is a solid fact. while it may be true that its all fact based, its when the connections and links are made that push the whole thing into mere “theory.” im not discrediting all this information, or just closing my eyes to it, because i too find some disturbing issues surrounding this whole thing, but at the same time, its very easy to fall into the conspiracy trap.

  • Comment by tom on May 30th, 2006 at 10:47 am:

    it’s time to face the facts guys: what really destroyed the towers and pentagon was in fact a tampon farted out of Hillary Clinton’s dirty ass.

  • Comment by drew on May 30th, 2006 at 6:39 pm:

    ewww…

  • Comment by Craig on May 31st, 2006 at 1:35 pm:

    DREW! I’m devastated! You don’t agree with my profound insight into the troubling connections between Lincoln and Kennedy?

    heh.

    -Craig

  • Comment by Sean on June 1st, 2006 at 8:08 pm:

    WTF? everyone knows 9/11 was caused by sunlight relfecting off of swamp gas. Duh

  • Comment by hattrick on June 6th, 2006 at 11:56 am:

    What about building 7?..It was pulled as told by larry silverstein on documentary that aired on PBS..but the mainstream media said it went down due to fire..yet at no time in modern history has a modern skyscraper ever went down in a few hours due to fire it usually takes days..not hours..That in of itself is a mystery why did building 7 go down and not other closer near by buildings?..why did those building catch on fire but did not go down?..or why was the damage so serve to 7?..Mr Silverstein said pull it..thats why..why did he suggest that?..because he owns it and the insurance pay out would be huge..byutalso it takes week of preperation to delomish a bulding like that,.not hours..so ow did they pull it so damn fast..?>>mystrey indeed

  • Comment by hattrick on June 6th, 2006 at 11:57 am:

    Also Larry owned the world trade towers as well..

  • Comment by hattrick on June 6th, 2006 at 12:00 pm:

    2) Mayor Willie Brown of San Francisco was told not to fly to New York the day before 9/11.

    Not just him ..he went public is all…But a laundry list of polticians were told not to fly and business leaders, federal agents,intelliegcne officials..and others..were given a warning not to fly..plus NORAD stood down on that day..why?..supposedly they were doing a test..what was the test it was a simulation of planes being flown into the trade towers..they were doing a simulation of the cvery same event that was happening…strange huh?..u know if NORAd was operating those planes would have been shot down..

  • Comment by Stefan on June 6th, 2006 at 4:53 pm:

    Yeah!!! Hattrick finally some sensible comments I totally agree with your points… not because I am a crazy conspiracy theorists but because there are on the public record and factual.

    To add onto that the London bombings also coincidentally occurred on the same day as drills being done buy a security company. Lets hope there is no attack drills in Canada I for one will be blaming our government and not the Muslim patsies.

  • Comment by Jonathan on June 20th, 2006 at 1:08 pm:

    Here’s some links from the popular movie Loose Change…it speaks for itself….

    2 different links…One great accomplishment

    http://www.youtube.c...earch=loose%20change

    http://www.youtube.c...earch=loose%20change

  • Comment by Wilson on June 20th, 2006 at 9:59 pm:

    The reason the Pentagon releases this video is to center the debate around th pentagon “no-plane theory” which is not a thoery supported by facts. There were hundreds of witnesses who said they saw a flight 77 hit the pentagon…

    Those 13 points made earlier by stefan are FACTS, and I noticed nobody has even attempted to challenge them.

    But have they been reported on Democracy now? of course not. They are Gatekeeping, just like Noam Chomsky. The administration that was responsable for this is still in power, and is now supported by the Canadian governemnt…Scare the public into giving up their basic rights and giving them more power…our Canadian government is doing that now with the hyping of the purported terrorist cell…We have to call them on their lies before the next fake attack. It’s past the time for armchair speculation. Just fucking say it. 9-11 was in inside job that is still being used to justify policy and law change in Canada and the U.S.

    Fuck

  • Comment by p@r@$!+e on June 25th, 2006 at 8:13 am:

    If your smart you’ll listen to me…
    This pentagon attack was planned & was replanned over and over…the pentagon flash anitmation, and all video pertaining to this attack was well monitored and “controlled”; is PROPAGANDA was simply a an attempt for the U.S. military to gain support in the future decades or decade to simply stear the public away form the WTC demolitions, by releasing plane footage. Heres the link which basically outlines the fact that the FBI took the films of the plane before it hit the pentagon. http://www.freedomun...oryhole/pentagon.php

    More improtantlly what should be analyzed are the U.S militaries and Commander in Cheifs intentions and justifications for war and his disrespect for the U.S constitution.well i could go on and on but this blog is about the blurry white thing.

    As a us citizen…not by choice I am constantly dumbfounded at our situation and how rediculously corrupt our administrations are.. the military industrial/corporation complex is in full effect.

  • Comment by p@r@$!+e on June 28th, 2006 at 3:39 pm:

    but im still spectacle about this whole thing until I see the videos the FBI confinscated

Dialogue has ended on this post.